Former President Donald Trump’s “hush money” trial continues in New York on May 2.
Follow here for the live updates:
Trump Claims Gag Order Prevents Him From Testifying
In a departure from previous answers, President Trump signaled he may not testify at trial after all.
“Well I’m not allowed to testify, I’m under a gag order,” he said, before turning to his attorney. “I guess.”
Mr. Blanche smiled and gave a non-committal shake of his head.
“We’re going to be appealing the gag order. I’d love to answer that question, it’s a very easy question, the easiest question, but I’m not allowed to testify because this judge, who’s totally conflicted, has me under an unconstitutional gag order,” he said.
“Other people are allowed to do whatever they want and I’m not allowed, as a presidential candidate, the leading candidate, the Republican candidate nominee and the one who’s leading Biden by a lot, and I’m not allowed to talk,” he said.
Trump Says He Should Be Out Campaigning Instead
President Trump blasted the case as election interference as he left court for the day.
“I’m very happy about the way things are going,” he told reporters outside the courtroom. But “looking outside” at the economy and rise in crime, he said he thought it “ridiculous” to be sitting in a courtroom all day.
“Never done before in our country and I want to be out campaigning, like I was yesterday when I finally had a break,” he said. “There’s never been anything like this in the history of our country, ever. The polls are great despite that.”
A reporter asked about Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and President Trump said, “RFK, I don’t know anything about him.”
“I don’t see him as a factor,” he said.
Manhattan DA Employee Questioned
Douglas Daus works in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office processing digital evidence. He confirmed the process for extracting data from phones, and confirmed that Mr. Cohen was one of the parties from whom evidence was collected.
A voice memo recording of Mr. Trump was played.
“Maybe because of this it would be better if you didn’t go,” he says. “This goes away quickly. In two weeks it’s fine. At this point I think it’s better.”
Mr. Cohen says on a voice memo recording, “I’ve spoken to Allen Weisselberg about how to set the thing up with funding.”
Manhattan DA Employee Questioned
Douglas Daus works in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office processing digital evidence. He confirmed the process for extracting data from phones, and confirmed that Mr. Cohen was one of the parties from whom evidence was collected.
Attorneys Play Cohen Recording
Attorneys played a record of a conversation Mr. Cohen had with Mr. Davidson.
Mr. Cohen said, “What would you do if you were me? Would you write a book? Would you break away from the entire Trump doctrine? Because it’s not just me, it’s my entire family that’s being affected. … Who else would do that for someone else? I did. Because I care about the guy, and I wasn’t going to play penny-wise, pound-foolish.”
They also played the clips of Mr. Davidson describing Ms. Clifford hypothetically having “settler’s remorse” and Mr. Avenatti driving “a serious wedge” between Ms. Clifford and Ms. Rodriguez.
Mr. Davidson also said on a recording there was no indication the money Mr. Cohen paid to Ms. Clifford came from Donald Trump, and that they never discussed whether Mr. Cohen would be getting that money from Mr. Trump.
In another recording, he claimed that Ms. Rodriguez’s boyfriend had been screaming at him that not letting the story get out was a “lost opportunity” he was going to sue Mr. Davidson over, and that Ms. Clifford wanted the money more than he could ever imagine. Mr. Davidson had claimed in the recording that he would not have been surprised if the boyfriend went to the media to sell the story.
Mr. Davidson finished his testimony.
Attorneys Play Cohen Recording
Attorneys played a record of a conversation Mr. Cohen had with Mr. Davidson.
Mr. Cohen said, “What would you do if you were me? Would you write a book? Would you break away from the entire Trump doctrine? Because it’s not just me, it’s my entire family that’s being affected. … Who else would do that for someone else? I did. Because I care about the guy, and I wasn’t going to play penny-wise, pound-foolish.”
Davidson Says He Worked With Cohen After Stormy Deal
Mr. Davidson confirmed that he continued to correspond with Mr. Cohen in 2018, after the deal in which Mr. Davidson represented Ms. Clifford. At one point, Mr. Cohen was opposing counsel in a separate matter.
Mr. Davidson said he was previously interviewed by prosecutors about his talks with Mr. Cohen, including phone calls which Mr. Davidson thought might have been recorded.
“Certainly I recall a few conversations when I was speaking with Mr. Cohen, and the conversations seemed off, which led me to think I was being recorded,” he said. “It was a more structured conversation which wasn’t really his usual manner.”
Mr. Davidson was played a clip from his interview in which he told Mr. Cohen, “sometimes people get settler’s remorse” in March 2018.
He said it appeared they were talking about Ms. Clifford but he could not remember.
Mr. Davidson said that Michael Avenatti represented Ms. Clifford later in 2018, and confirmed after listening to a clip that he had said Mr. Avenatti “has really driven a wedge, a serious wedge, between Stormy and Gina.”
“It’s my recollection that Ms. Rodriguez’s tenure did not last very long with Mr. Avenatti,” Mr. Davidson said in court.
Mr. Davidson confirmed he spoke with Mr. Cohen in 2018 before he gave a CNN interview. He also testified that from his perspective the contract he prepared for Ms. Clifford was a serious legal agreement, “not fake language designed to hide something,” as Mr. Bove phrased it in his question.
The court took a break.
Davidson Testifies About 2011 Cease and Desist Letter
Mr. Davidson continued his testimony, providing additional background details to how he began to work with Ms. Clifford. He confirmed that when Ms. Rodriguez wanted him to issue a cease-and-desist to get an article about Ms. Clifford’s alleged encounter with Mr. Trump taken down from a blog in 2011, the manager and actress had looked at other deals.
“They were using my efforts to create an exclusive opportunity with another magazine,” Mr. Davidson said.
Defense Asks Judge If Trump Can Post Certain Articles
Defense attorney Susan Necheles handed Justice Merchan a stack of articles by legal commentators that President Trump would like to post on Truth Social, all discussing the case.
“We think that they are perfectly fine, but we think that there is ambiguity about the gag order, so we are asking your honor to take a look at them so he knows he is not violating the gag order when he posts them,” Ms. Necheles said.
Justice Merchan declined.
“I’m not going to give advance rulings. There is no ambiguity, I believe, in the order,” the judge said. He added that the appellate division, which denied President Trump a stay and yesterday rejected his lawsuit challenging the judge’s orders including refusal to recuse and the gag order, did not find his order ambiguous.
Ms. Necheles asked about the articles.
“I think if in doubt, steer clear. That’s all I’m going to say,” Justice Merchan said.
Davidson Previously Investigated for Extortion
Mr. Davidson confirmed that non-disclosure agreements are commonly used. Mr. Bove also asked whether Mr. Davidson was “well-versed” in using a non-disclosure agreement without it being exortion.
“I don’t understand the question,” Mr. Davidson said.
Mr. Bove elicited testimony from Mr. Davidson that he was investigated for events in 2012 for committing extortion against celebrities like Hulk Hogan.
Mr. Davidson said he familiarized himself with the law and did everything to make sure he stayed within the law.
Mr. Bove questioned Mr. Davidson about other settlements he negotiated for former clients and Mr. Davidson invoked attorney-client privilege.
Davidson Concerned Cohen ‘Was Going to Kill Himself’
Mr. Davidson confirmed that he was concerned about Mr. Cohen’s “physical safety and well being” after Mr. Cohen called to initiate an hour-long talk about how he didn’t believe he wouldn’t be going to Washington.
“I thought he was going to kill himself,” Mr. Davidson said.
Mr. Bove asked whether Mr. Cohen had referenced potentially becoming Attorney General of the United States, and how it “was never going to happen and he was very, very upset about it.”
Mr. Davidson confirmed, “that’s correct.”
Mr. Davidson also testified that he had not thought about the statute of limitations as related to the case.
Mr. Bove asked, “One of the issues you had to be sensitive about was not to threaten that the payment not be made prior to the election, correct?”
Mr. Davidson said, “I don’t recall.”
Davidson Cross-Examined
Attorney Emil Bove questioned Mr. Davidson for the defense.
Mr. Davidson said what he knew about Donald Trump “certainly” did not come from Mr. Cohen.
He confirmed that Karen McDougal’s goals in doing a media deal were to rejuvenate her career, make money, and to not have to tell her story of the alleged affair with Mr. Trump. He said that Mr. Cohen was not involved with this deal, and that Mr. Davidson had only reached out to him after it had closed as professional courtesy because the story involved Mr. Cohen’s client.
Davidson Says Cohen Funded Deal Himself
Mr. Davidson and Mr. Cohen also texted regarding a statement Mr. Davidson would issue denying that President Trump paid for the deal.
Mr. Davidson sent to CNN news broadcaster Chris Cuomo a statement that Mr. Cohen had paid Ms. Clifford “from his own personal funds” and this was what Mr. Cohen had also informed him at the time of the agreement.
Mr. Davidson maintained the statement was truthful because Mr. Cohen had, prior to wiring the money, stated “I’ll just do it myself.”
The court took a break.
Davidson Says Balancing Cohen, Clifford Like Trying to ‘Thread a Needle’
Texts also showed Mr. Davidson responding that Ms. Clifford’s manager Gina Rodriguez was also not happy, as her client had made her “look like a liar.”
“Gina says she is going to have a LONG talk with stormy on the plane to N.Y. tomorrow/ She assured me this will get handled,” Mr. Davidson texted Mr. Cohen.
“Like I said, we’re trying to thread a needle, and hold of allegations of breach where Cohen would sue Stormy and that would be another disaster. So we’re trying to placate him while also trying to meet Stormy’s desires,” Mr. Davidson said.
He confirmed Mr. Cohen threatened to sue many times.
“He can be a very aggressive guy,” he said. “He wanted to deny her story, to protect his client.”
Davidson Discusses ‘Stormy’ Interview, Denial Statement
Mr. Davidson read texts into the record where he confirmed, on Jan. 24, 2018, that Ms. Clifford “steadfastly refuses to speak about the past” after they had a conversation. Then the next day, Mr. Cohen texts Mr. Davidson, “Why is she going on Kimmel after the Sotu.”
Mr. Davidson responded that he didn’t know and was also upset about it.
“She said this is her shot. i’m meeting with her this weekend to prep her and get the statement,” he texted back,
Mr. Davidson testified, “At this moment in time, I was in a difficult situation, and I think Stormy was in a difficult situation.”
Ms. Clifford was facing disgorgement of the $130,000 she may have needed to pay back, if it was enforceable, Mr. Davidson said.
“And Stormy saying this was her shot, she wanted to talk about her life and reinvigorate her career. so this was a conversation about Stormy Daniels going on the Late Night Show Jimmy Kimmel,” Mr. Davidson said.
On Jan. 30, 2018, he received a text from Mr. Cohen: “It’s out.”
“Apparently there was a news article that had been published. I was receiving hundreds of phone calls at my office,” Mr. Davidson said.
He text Mr. Cohen back: “She is stating that she offered it and released it of her own volition.”
Ms. Clifford issued a statement that read, “I am not denying this affair because I was paid ‘hush money.’”
Mr. Davidson said that the statement was technically true, pointing to the fact that there was never a “relationship” alleged and there was no “hush money.”
A string of texts between Mr. Cohen and Mr. Davidson at midnight Jan. 31, 2018, showed their shock that Ms. Clifford denied signing the statement on Kimmel after she posted the signed statement on her social media.
“I was getting all this information but I wasn’t watching the show,” Mr. Davidson explained.
“Michael was upset about what he understood as Stormy denying that she had signed the statement,” Mr. Davidson said.
Davidson Says Cohen Scheduled ‘Hannity’ Appearance
Mr. Davidson read an email from Mr. Cohen that stated he had Ms. Clifford “tentatively scheduled for Hannity tonight” on Jan. 17, 2018.
Mr. Davidson said he was in trial at the time, which was “frankly, all-consuming,” yet Mr. Cohen had been in one of his “pants on fire stages” and “frantic,” sending “many, many calls and many, many text messages with little regard for my schedule.”
He clarified that when Mr. Cohen asked him to issue a strong denial as he did in 2011, he was referring to the cease-and-desist Mr. Davidson sent the blog that published a third-party account of Ms. Clifford’s alleged affair and “there was no denial” in that letter. “That was just wrong,” Mr. Davidson added.
Mr. Davidson said his understanding was that Mr. Cohen thought the Hannity appearance “would somehow help him and his client.”
“I have an understanding that he believed that she would further deny the interaction,” Mr. Davidson said. Mr. Cohen later emailed back the same day saying “the wise men all believe the story is dying” and the appearance never happened.
Davidson Says ‘It Wasn’t Hush Money’
“Did you intend this statement to be cleverly misleading?” Mr. Steinglass asked about the denial statement.
“I don’t understand your question,” Mr. Davidson said.
“It’s really no different than our interaction a few minutes ago, where you called it a payoff. It wasn’t a payoff, and it wasn’t hush money. It was consideration in a settlement agreement.”
Mr. Steinglass asked if he meant he didn’t think the term “hush money” was accurate, and rephrased to ask, “Would you use the phrase hush money?”
“I would never use that word,” Mr. Davidson said.
“What would you use?” Mr. Steinglass asked.
“Consideration,” Mr. Davidson said.
Davidson Says Clifford 2018 Denial ‘Technically’ True
Mr. Davidson confirmed he prepared Ms. Clifford’s 2018 statement denying an affair.
It reads, “I recently became aware that certain news outlets are alleging that I had a sexual and/or romantic affair with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago. I am stating with complete clarity that this is absolutely false. My involvement with Donald Trump was limited to a few public appearances and nothing more.”
Mr. Steinglass asked Mr. Davidson to “characterize the truthfulness of this statement.”
“Well, I think this is a tactic that is oftentimes used in the oftentimes cat-and-mouse interactions between the public, attorneys, and the press. And an extremely strict reading of this denial would technically be true. I think you would have to go through it word by word, and if you did, it would technically be true with an extremely fine reading of it,” Mr. Davidson said.
“I think you have to hone in on the definition of ‘romantic and/or sexual affair,’” Mr. Davidson said. “I don’t think anyone had ever alleged that any interaction between she and Mr. Trump was romantic.”
“How about sexual?” Mr. Steinglass asked.
“Well, that wouldn’t be ‘sexual and/or romantic,’” Mr. Davidson said.
Davidson Confirms Denial Issued in 2018
Mr. Davidson confirmed he received requests for comment from the Wall Street Journal in 2018 about the Ms. Clifford deal, and he stated “Nothing about the present day regurgitation of these rumors causes us to rethink our prior denial issued in 2011.”
Mr. Davidson forwarded a copy of his January 2018 response to Michael Cohen.
“Because we had a mutuality of interest at this point in time,” he said. “We had a fully executed settlement agreement, and confidentiality agreement, and now the underlying matter was about to be published. I think I had a contractual duty to let them know that something was about to be published, and we were acting in unison.”
Correspondence between Mr. Cohen and Mr. Davidson showed that Mr. Cohen asked Mr. Davidson to write “a strong denial comment” for Ms. Clifford.
Davidson Says Cohen Upset at Not Being Given Position in White House
Mr. Davidson said that Mr. Cohen called him “fairly frequently” after the election.
“There was one particular day in mid-December,” Mr. Davidson said, placing it after President Trump was sworn in. “I got a call from a very sad and despondent Michael Cohen.”
“The whole situation was very off, that he was calling me and I was in this strangely decorated department store and there was this long phone call and he was depressed and despondent. He used very colorful language about that stage of his life,” Mr. Davidson said.
Mr. Davidson recalled an expletive-laden complaint from Mr. Cohen about not being “in Washington, after everything I’ve done.”
“I can’t believe I’m not going to Washington,” he recalled Mr. Cohen said. “And then he made reference to, ‘I never even got paid, that guy’s not going to pay me the $130,000 back.’”
Davidson Discusses WSJ Exposé
Mr. Davidson confirmed he talked to Mr. Cohen about the Wall Street Journal article “that publicized the underlying contract between Karen McDougal and AMI.
“He was very upset that the article had been published, he was very upset about the timing of the article, he wanted to know who the source of the article was,” Mr. Davidson said. “He stated that his boss was very upset, and he threatened to sue Karen McDougal.”
Davidson Confirms Cohen Wired Funds
Attorneys showed email correspondence on Oct. 11, 2016, where Mr. Cohen and Mr. Davidson confirmed funds were wired.
Mr. Cohen signed off as the Managing Member of Essential Consultants LLC.
“Funds received,” Mr. Davidson wrote to Mr. Cohen. The money went into an escrow account. Texts between Mr. Davidson and Mr. Howard showed that Mr. Davidson said he was “never really sure” the deal would close.
The deal required that Ms. Clifford, in the contract under the pseudonym Peggy Peterson, not directly or indirectly disclose or disseminate the “confidential information” at issue. It also included a line that stated liquidated damages was $1 million, or the amount Ms. Clifford would have to pay if she breached the contract.
“I believe this agreement was unenforcable,” Mr. Davidson said, explaining that it was so far above the settlement amount that the $1 million “really served no purpose.” He said Mr. Cohen had requested this line.
Mr. Cohen of Essential Consultants signed on behalf of “David Dennison,” a pseudonym used for Donald Trump, and Mr. Davidson signed for Ms. Clifford.
Davidson ‘Lost Trust’ in Cohen
Keith Davidson returned to the witness stand to continue his testimony. Mr. Davidson is an attorney who represented Karen McDougal in her deal with American Media Inc. (AMI) and Stephanie Clifford (Stormy Daniels) in her deal with Mr. Cohen.
He read into the record an email from Dylan Howard, former chief content officer at AMI, to Mr. Davidson and Mr. Cohen on Oct. 26, 2016.
Mr. Davidson said that over the course of dealing with Mr. Cohen and requesting payment that never arrived for the deal for Ms. Clifford, he “lost trust in what he [Cohen] was telling me.”
Mr. Davidson said that Mr. Howard sought to play mediator to complete the deal, and mediated a meeting between Mr. Davidson and Mr. Cohen.
“I believed Michael Cohen was not telling me the truth,” Mr. Davidson said.
“About what?” prosecuting attorney Joshua Steinglass asked.
The delays in funding,” Mr. Davidson answered.
Judge Rejects Jury Statement Defense
Mr. Blanche argued that President Trump did not violate his gag order when he gave a 21-minute interview that mentioned the case. President Trump had said the jurors were selected in a blue city that voted 95 percent Democrat.
“This trial matters to voters, and there was a question about this trial. We very much believe that this is political persecution,” Mr. Blanche argued.
“Did he violate the gag order?” Justice Merchan asked.
“I’m making an argument that he didn’t,” Mr. Blanche said.
“I’m not accepting your argument,” Justice Merchan said. “That’s the implication to anyone who reads that comment, this is not a fair jury.”
Mr. Blanche said that President Trump did not speak about any single juror, which he added the press has done.
The judge called for a short break before the jury was brought in.
Blanche Argues Cohen Doesn’t Need Gag Order Protection
Mr. Blanche read as examples several posts by Mr. Cohen mocking President Trump, and submitted one where Mr. Cohen had posted an image of President Trump in an orange jumpsuit.
“Mr. Cohen has started going on TikTok nightly and literally making money with people doing things while they’re watching you on TikTok,” Mr. Blanche said. “This is not a man that needs protection from the gag order, and when you look at what President Trump said about Mr. Cohen out here, and in response to the question from the interviewer, he wasn’t talking about his testimony in this trial.”
The judge said he wanted to move on to a comment about the jury.
Judge Rejects Trump-Media Comparison
Mr. Blanche argued that every time he and his client confer it’s a live update across several media outlets, and as the Republican candidate running for president, “it’s also appropriate to react to what’s happening in this trial.”
He argued President Trump couldn’t repeatedly answer “no comment” about the trial.
The judge said he rejected the media analogy.
“The former President of the United States is on trial. He’s the leading candidate for the Republican Party right now. It’s not surprising that we have people in the overflow room,” Justice Merchan said. “I don’t see how it reflects on President Trump if 10 outlets are talking about the order.”
“I don’t have authority over the press. I don’t have authority over most of the people that are saying things. I couldn’t possibly extend the gag order to them,” he said. “So I don’t see your analogy.”
Mr. Blanche argued that there was nothing threatening in the statement about Mr. Pecker, and there were no “threatening, menacing statements.”
The judge conceded that he was “not terribly concerned about that one.”
“I can see circumstances where that could be a concern but I’m not concerned about that one,” Justice Merchan said.
Blanche Defends Trump Pecker Answers
Mr. Blanche said that President Trump gave “factual, neutral” answers when asked about David Pecker or his testimony.
“It wasn’t a warning, it wasn’t commentary about what David Pecker would be testifying about. There”s no threat in what President Trump said, and we cited, there’s multiple articles, new articles, that are going into excruciating detail about Mr. Pecker’s testimony,” Mr. Blanche said.
The judge pushed back, and said it wasn’t just the substance of the comment itself that he thought an issue.
“It’s not just about Mr. Pecker, it’s about what all the other witnesses who may come here see. If the witnesses see President Trump speaking about Mr. pecker it affects the others as well,” Justice Merchan said.
“It’s not just about those individuals, it’s about what everybody else, jurors and al the other witnesses see. And that’s a concern, that does go to the integrity of the proceedings,” the judge said.
Defense Says Even Biden Is Commenting on Trial
Defense attorney Todd Blanche said they’ve heeded the court’s most recent decision and order regarding the previous nine gag order violations in preparing today’s arguments.
He sought to provide context, and argued that it’s not enough to look at the exact date and time of a post to decide whether President Trump’s statements are responses. He pointed out that President Joe Biden recently commented on President Trump and his trial in a public forum.
“He mocked President Trump, said ‘Donald has had a few tough days lately, you might call it Stormy weather,’” Mr. Blanche said. “Your Honor, [it] is an obvious reference to Stormy Daniels.”
Justice Merchan affirmed that President Trump was “certainly allowed to respond to President Biden.”
“There’s nothing in the gag order that says he can’t,” the judge said.
Prosecution Says Now Is ‘Most Critical Time’ to Protect Proceeding
Prosecutors also pointed to remarks President Trump made outside the courtroom when he referred to payments made to Michael Cohen, which are at the center of the trial.
President Trump had said, “But they called a payment to a lawyer a legal expense in the books. They didn’t call it construction, they didn’t call it building a building … He [Cohen] represented a lot of people, but he puts in an invoice, a bill, and they call it a legal expense. I got indicted for that. … And when are they going to look into the lies Cohen did in the last trial?”
Prosecutors argued President Trump was disrupting the case with “corrosive” statements.
“This is the most critical time, the time the proceeding has to be protected, particularly where a defendant has demonstrated over time, and recently, his willingness to do everything he can to disrupt the process,” they argued.
Prosecutors also argued that “Michael Cohen is not a political opponent,” and so the gag order does not carve out an exception for President Trump to respond to him.
“The existence of a lawful order I don’t think really is at issue at all,” prosecutors added.
Prosecutors Claim Witness Intimidation
On April 25, President Trump visited construction workers in Manhattan early morning before trial. A reporter asked about witness David Pecker’s interview, and President Trump replied “David’s been a very nice, a nice guy.”
“The witness was going to be testifying an hour or two after the defendant made that statement,” prosecutors argued, adding that President Trump did not answer all questions and yet selected this one.
“They are deliberate shots across the bow to anyone who comes to this courthouse to testify,” they argued.
Judge Hears Arguments on 4 More Gag Order Violations
Justice Merchan said the defense submitted close to 500 pages including a brief, memorandum of law, and exhibits arguing that President Trump did not violate his gag order, and asked prosecutors to present their arguments.
Prosecutors argued that even a statement that did not name any particular party could constitute a violation if it interfered with the proceedings. In one statement, President Trump said “but this judge said I can’t get away from the trial, he’s rushing the trial like crazy. Nobody’s ever seen anything like this … it’s a very unfair situation, that I can tell you.”
“This is just hours before he had a hearing here related to his preceding violations,” prosecutors argued. “There’s no inference needed, it’s not just any jurors, it’s those jurors who are going to be seated here in a few minutes.”
“The defendant saying anything amplifies it and creates an air of menace that is substantially different from a media report,” they argued.
Trump Says Case Should Have Been Brought 8 Years Ago
On President Trump’s one-day-a-week off trial, he held two rallies in two states, and told reporters yesterday’s events in Wisconsin and Michigan were “tremendous.”
“Enthusiasm’s never been better. It’s nice to be able to campaign one day without being in this Biden trial, show trial,” President Trump said, adding that he thought the coverage of the rallies was “fair.”
He commented on inflation and college campuses, as well as the trial before heading in for another hearing on whether he violated his gag order.
“You just do know that this case could’ve been brought eight years ago,” he said. “Instead they wait and wait and wait … they have no case. We have a very conflicted judge.”
“They wait til I announce? … and then they started Super Tuesday,” he said. “Who starts a case right in the middle of somebody’s election, it should be illegal, it’s election interference.”
President Trump also praised “New York’s finest” and said the college campus clashes have been the work of “radical leftists.”
“Don’t worry about the right,” he said. “These are radical left lunatics and they’ve got to be stopped now … we’re not letting them take over the USA.”
What to Know
New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has scheduled a 9:30 a.m. hearing on an order for the defense to show cause why he should not hold the defendant, former President Donald Trump, in contempt for four public statements he has made about the case.
The hearing comes after the judge found President Trump in violation of his gag order in nine of 10 social media posts flagged by prosecutors, issuing a $9,000 fine on April 30. The judge also ordered the deletion of the relevant social media posts, and warned President Trump he could face incarceration with repeated offenses.
President Trump is on trial for allegedly falsifying 34 business records in an attempt to influence the 2016 elections.
Testimony will continue today after the morning hearing.
Trump Removes Social Media Posts That Judge Says Violated Gag Order
Former President Donald Trump removed multiple social media and website posts on Tuesday to comply with a judge’s order.
Earlier Tuesday, Judge Juan Merchan ordered the former president to remove seven posts on Truth Social and two on his campaign website, alleging they violated a gag order. He also held President Trump in contempt of the court and fined him $9,000 for the posts.
He told the former president that the offending posts must be removed by 2:15 p.m. ET. The posts were removed by that time.
“Defendant is hereby warned that the Court will not tolerate continued willful violations of its lawful orders and that if necessary and appropriate under the circumstances, it will impose an incarceratory punishment,” Judge Merchan wrote in the order.
The deleted posts on Truth Social appeared to be mainly re-posts of other individuals, including ones that criticized potential witnesses Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen, according to a review of the posts. “This resource could not be found,” one of the now-deleted posts said.
From The Epoch Times
